Misinformation Through Selective Information Geared Toward Anti-EU Narrative Building
Keywords:
Misinformation, Anti-EU Narratives, Euroscepticism, EU Accession, Russian Influence, North MacedoniaAbstract
This paper examines how misinformation and selective information framing drove anti-EU sentiment in North Macedonia following the 2022 proposal of the EU negotiating framework (the “French Proposal”). Focusing on the 2020–2024 period, the study uses qualitative discourse analysis (70 analyzed templates) and quantitative digital data harvesting across platforms like Twitter/X, YouTube, and digital media outlets.
The primary finding highlights an unusual convergence between traditional pro-Russian nationalist actors (e.g., Levica, VMRO-DPMNE) and “unusual suspects”—historically pro-Western, EU- and USAID-funded NGOs, think tanks (such as EPI and IDSCS), and prominent public figures. Both groups leveraged tropes portraying the EU accession framework as a threat to Macedonian national identity (“Bulgarianization”) and framed the EU as duplicitous and unyielding. This narrative promoted euro-nihilism, advocating for frozen negotiations, “full sovereignty,” or regional alternatives like “Open Balkans”.
Quantitative tracking revealed heavily shared anti-framework content, peak usage of anti-EU/nationalist hashtags, and significant overlap with Serbian media narratives that facilitate indirect Russian influence. The study concludes that inadvertent anti-EU rhetoric from reputable, civil-society actors mainstreamed euro-skepticism, normalizing a state of stalled EU integration and geopolitical limbo in North Macedonia.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Identities: Journal for Politics, Gender and Culture

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Identities is published under the following license: Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0). Under this license, users of our content must give appropriate credit to authors and source as well as indicate if changes were made, cannot be used for commercial purposes, and, in the instance that it is built upon or transformed, may not be distributed. For Identities, the copyrights allow the audience to download, reprint, quote in length and/or copy articles published by Identities so long as the authors and source are cited. For more information on our license, see the following: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0.



